Sunday, December 13, 2009

...hungry...sleepy...smelly...on level 6....

The video game gender debate has been going on for years now, fueled mainly by complaints that the video game industry continues to make games that primarily appeal to males (woo hoo for that!). Perhaps it's not the fault of the video game industry, but a result of a psychological tendency.

A new study reports that men's brains are more responsive to video games than women's.

According to MRI scans, the zones of the brain associated with reward and addiction are much more active in men's brains when they played a simple video game. Last year, there was an effort to get the American Medical Association to classify video game addiction as an official disorder -- perhaps these folks now have some more evidence to support that claim.

So why does it seem like guys like video games more than women? I'm sure there are plenty of women who like to blow stuff up and battle pixilated monsters or throw a 90-yard bomb. But, it's mainly a guy thing. So why is that?

That's what Fumiko Hoeft wanted to figure out. She's a researcher with the Stanford School of Medicine. She arranged a pretty cool experiment. She got 22 Stanford undergrads -- 11 men and 11 women -- to play a video game inside an MRI scanner, a machine that allows scientists to see what's happening inside the body.

As the young gamers were in the MRI machine happily playing away, Fumiko took a look at what was happening inside their brains. "What happened was that both men and women showed activation in regions that are related to the reward and addiction circuitry, but what was interesting was that there was significant difference in the amount of activation and the amount of coherence, how they were moving together."

Specifically, men's brains were much more active. And it wasn't because the game was particularly violent. If fact, it was pretty boring -- just clicking a bunch of balls bouncing off a wall at the middle of the screen.

Researchers designed this video game with a specific "gain-loss" component, which is a fancy way of saying that players have to nuke the red dot before it gets too close to the wall. If you nuke the dot, you gain territory; the space on the left gets bigger. That's the mission. If the ball hits the line before you nuke it, you lose territory. Researchers didn't explain this goal to the players. They wanted their natural instincts to take over. Many would argue men, by nature, are more territorial.

Men got more of a "reward" feeling than their female counterparts, and when the participants played a video game that had no territorial aspect, there was no difference in men's and women's brain activation. While this is obviously a new area of research and a small sampling, researchers say the gender differences may help explain why males are more attracted to video games and more likely to become "hooked" on them than females. It's also interesting to note that the computer games that are popular with males are territory and aggression-type games.

But the object of the game was telling. By clicking the balls in a certain way, the players could gain or lose territory. And men were significantly more hyped up by this challenge.

So in the end, Fumiko's point isn't that men like video games more than women (or men are smarter). That probably depends on the game. It's about how males seem to be more hard-wired than women are to get excited about claiming and conquering territory. Maybe that's why so many video games are about war and mowing down wave after wave of enemies. They're designed to appeal to the 'cave man' conqueror in men.

I should probably call in sick tomorrow...I am only on level 6 right now....

Sunday, December 6, 2009

...excuse me....Merry Christmas!.....

We can't say Merry Christmas anymore..?

" . . . every idiot who goes about with 'Merry Christmas' on his lips, should be boiled with his own pudding, and buried with a stake of holly through his heart." Sound familiar? Anyone who had the pleasure of reading Charles Dickens "A Christmas Carol" or have seen the many versions of it on television or in the theatres will recognize this quote from Scrooge himself. The word "Christmas" has more venom in today's society then a angry rattlesnake on a hot summer day. The question we have to ask ourselves is WHY?

To give an example; an atheist organization put a sign celebrating winter solstice next to a Nativity scene at the Legislative Building in Olympia, Washington. The sign reads "religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds." This organization claims the sign is important for atheists to see their viewpoints validated alongside everyone else's.

That's it...let's make sure EVERYONE is covered. All people are happy. Obama would be so proud of such a 'socialist' view...

When you see Christmas lights on houses in shapes of Santa Claus, snowmen, and other Christmas icons, not "Holiday', not "Winter Festival" but Christmas icons, what do you think of? You think of Christmas even if you do not believe in Christmas. These are the symbols of love. Why is it so wrong for Christians to display symbols of love one month of the year?

Again, the battle begins over Christmas. Those who think they are politically correct call it the "Holiday Season." Christmas was originally meant to celebrate Christ's birth. He came to this world to be crucified and rose in victory to save anyone from the consequences of sin who believes on His name and accepts Him as their personal Savior.

Liberals would not want Martin Luther King, Jr. Day to be changed to Black Liberty Day, they want to celebrate the holiday to honor Mr. King, which I certainly respect, and I don't believe that he himself would want to change the meaning of the Christmas Season, as he was a fine Christian man.

Oh, I apologize...does Martin Luther King fall under "Kwanzaa …a unique African American celebration with focus on the traditional African values of family, community responsibility, commerce, and self-improvement?"

Kwanzaa, a fake "African" holiday that was contrived in 1966 by Ron Karenga (born Ron Everett) who was a Black Panther that was kicked out of that violent racist club, and he then created the United Slaves Organization that was the Panther's rival and was worse than the Black Panthers.

What bothers me most about Kwanzaa is that duped people and the Gov't (US Postal Kwanzaa stamps) are starting to give legitimacy to this racist 'holiday' without acknowledging it's background and purpose. It is not a 'holiday' which all people can celebrate; it is a holiday for Blacks to separate themselves from the rest of America.

So next time someone says "Happy Kwanzaa" just remember they are talking about a fake holiday created by a Marxist Racist Black criminal in the '60s to lead Blacks away from the 'white man's' Christmas.

And I am supposed to be PC by not saying Merry Christmas? Not going to happen....Merry Christmas!